Start with the question
Choose a representative video set that includes a known channel, different durations and at least one item with missing text. This reveals how a connector handles gaps more clearly than a single successful transcript example.
A workflow you can check
Use the following steps as a small acceptance test. Keep the underlying observations with your notes so someone else can review the conclusion.
- Verify video and channel identifiers against the source pages.
- Check whether text comes from captions, another transcript source or a summary.
- Inspect comment pagination, sort order and sample bounds.
- Preserve timestamps so a reviewer can check a claim in context.
Interpret the evidence
MARqentic’s six YouTube tools cover channels, videos, comments and captions at the implementation level; live verification is pending. Do not promise universal transcript availability. Report missing captions and sampled comments explicitly in the final research brief.
A prompt to adapt
Replace the inputs with your own approved examples. Ask the assistant to explain its scope before starting research.
Evaluate this video research response. Verify identifiers, transcript provenance, timestamp support and comment sampling, then list the claims a reviewer should check against the video.